Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Winston v. Winston
Winston v. Winston, 189 U.S. 506 (1903)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1903-04-13
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Winston v. Winston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Per Curiam. Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 ; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14.