Wilson v. United States

affirming conviction despite the assumed fact that board members had not met the residency requirements, even assuming these requirements were mandatory rather than directory | affirming conviction despite the assumed fact that board members had not met the residency requirements, even assuming these requirements were mandatory rather than directory | the prosecution must present “substantial evidence which would tend to establish the trustworthiness of the statement” | "shall" usually denotes imperative, but court may consider background circumstances, context of statute, and intent of Congress | a defendant's plea of guilty to a particular offense does not waive privilege of self-incrimination as to other offenses arising out of same transaction | “shall” usually denotes imperative, but court may consider background circumstances, context of statute, and intent of Congress