Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Williams v. Dormire

532 U.S. 931

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2001-03-19
Topic
general

assuming the clerk limited any conversation to administrative and logistical matters | “There is no question . . . that defendants satisfied the first prong . . . because African-Americans are unquestionably a ‘distinct’ group for purposes of [this] analysis” | “[T]his Court is not required to pass upon a constitutional issue unless it affirmatively appears that the issue was raised and determined in the trial court.” (quotations and citations omitted) | Apprendi does not make the North Carolina capital sentencing scheme unconstitutional because the State does not have to notify a defendant prior to trial of the aggravating factors upon which the State intends to rely | Apprendi does not make the North Carolina capital sentencing scheme unconstitutional because the State does not have to notify a defendant prior to trial of the aggravating factors upon which the State intends to rely

Citator

Cited by
68 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.