Williams v. Arnold & Arnold Law Firm

this Court rejected appellant's argument that under Tibbetts juror's deliberate withholding of pertinent information was not consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness | this Court rejected appellant’s argument that under Tibbetts juror’s deliberate withholding of pertinent information was not consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness | convictions set aside under FYCA can be considered in computing criminal history points | adequacy of remaining charges determined by statutory maximum sentences