Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Whitfield v. Burns
431 U.S. 910
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1977-05-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the Government’s invocation of restrictive contract principles is “disingenuous”
- enforcing district attorney's promise that the defendant would be paroled within a certain time
- government’s proffer of information at sentencing to correct defendant’s misstatements did not breach plea bargain under which government had agreed not to take position on sentence
- prosecutor absolutely immune from suit for damages alleging nonfulfillment of negotiated plea agreement
- court may order specific enforcement of plea agreement improperly promising parole release
- remedy for broken plea bargain is discretionary with court
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Whitfield v. Burns. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 64 opinions
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. Ala.