Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

WHITE v. UNITED STATES, 493 U.S. 5 (1989)

493 U.S. 5

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-16
Topic
general

WHITE v. UNITED STATES, 493 U.S. 5 (1989) WHITE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SMITH v. UNITED STATES ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 88-928. Argued October 3, 1989Decided October 16, 1989 Certiorari dismissed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WHITE v. UNITED STATES, 493 U.S. 5 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WHITEv. UNITED STATES,493 U.S. 5(1989)
WHITE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SMITHv. UNITED STATES ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 88-928.
Argued October 3, 1989
Decided October 16, 1989
Certiorari dismissed. Reported below:853 F.2d 107.
Kenneth A. Paymentargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs wasJames M. White, pro se.Alan I. Horowitzargued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief wereSolicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Peterson,Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Charles E. Brookhart, andJoan I.Oppenheimer.fn*
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

JUSTICE WHITE dissents.Page 6
  1. Page 5Waller H. Horsley, Louis A. Craco, Charles E. Heming, Jonathan G. Blattmachr, Arthur M. Sherwood, Alexander C. Cordes, SanfordJ. Schlesinger, Jules J. Haskel, Albert Kalter, Thomas P. Sweeney, andGeraldine S. Hemmerlingfiled a brief for the New York State Bar Association et al. asamici curiaeurging reversal. ↩