White Industries, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

How later courts describe this case

• affirming summary judgment for buyer where there “is not the slightest evidence” to support assertion that buyer was in land sales business
• distinguishing privity between principal and agent from privity between a governmental entity and officials sued in their individual capacities
• declining to do so where public employer failed to provide “any evidence of actual harmful effects” or where interference with public employee’s duties was “de mini-mis or merely speculative”