Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

West 14th Street Commercial Corp. v. 5 West 14th Owners Corp.

W. 14th St. Commercial Corp. v. 5 W. 14th Owners Corp., 484 U.S. 871 (1987)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-10-05
Topic
real-estate

holding that FERC’s interpretation of a settlement agreement between the Commission’s staff and a private party was entitled to Chevron deference | discussing why a lease is a "contract" within meaning of the Act | even if Staff is considered a “party” to settlement negotiations, the Commission itself does not thereby become improperly involved in negotiations | use of the term “set up” in a familial context implied that one family member provided an opportunity to another family member on the basis of kinship, not merit | "if the agency itself were an interested party ... deference might lead a court to endorse self-serving views that an agency might offer...." | “[A] plaintiff may prove the defendant’s subjective state of mind through the cumulation of circumstantial evidence.” | “if the agency itself were an interested party ... deference might lead a court to endorse self-serving views that an agency might of-fer_” | court should defer to agency’s construction of agreement | court should defer to agency's construction of agreement

Citator

Cited by
56 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of Council for Owner-Occupied Housing, Inc., for leave to file a brief as *872 amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.