Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation

435 U.S. 903

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-02-27
Topic
general

Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted. The parties are directed to address the following issue: “Whether the partial geographic and subject matter jurisdiction exercised by the State of Washington within the Yakima Indian Reservation pursuant to Public Law 280 violates either the statutory requirements of Public Law 280 or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

Appeal from C. A. 9th Cir. Probable jurisdiction noted. The parties are directed to address the following issue: “Whether the partial geographic and subject matter jurisdiction exercised by the State of Washington within the Yakima Indian Reservation pursuant to Public Law 280 violates either the statutory requirements of Public Law 280 or the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”