Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent

Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2008)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2008-03-03
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

explicitly rejecting the result in Garcia and finding a similar provision not preempted

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Warner-Lambert Co. v. Kent. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 34 opinions

(Slip Opinion)            Cite as:

552 U. S. ____

 (2008)                              1

                                     Per Curiam

       NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
       preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
       notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash-
       ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
       that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
                                     _________________

                                     No. 06–1498
                                     _________________


WARNER-LAMBERT CO., LLC, ET AL., PETITIONERS v.
          KIMBERLY KENT ET AL.
 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
           APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
                                   [March 3, 2008]

   PER CURIAM.
   The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

  THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or
decision of this case.