Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Villa v. Van Schaick

296 U.S. 544

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1935-10-25
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed *545for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52. Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Villa v. Van Schaick. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed *545 for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee. Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.