Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio v. Siler-Khodr

537 U.S. 1087

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-12-16
Topic
employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

How later courts describe this case

  • finding that class action waivers in arbitration proceedings do not “necessarily choke off the supply of lawyers willing to pursue claims on behalf of debtors”
  • stating "[w]e [] reject Snowden's argument that the Arbitration Agreement is unenforceable as unconscionable because without the class action vehicle, she will be unable to maintain her legal representation given the small amount of her individual damages"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio v. Siler-Khodr. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
31 opinions

537 U.S. 1087

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO
v.
SILER-KHODR ET AL.

No. 02-253.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 16, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 261 F. 3d 542.