Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United States v. National Malleable & Steel Castings Co.

United States v. Nat’l Malleable & Steel Castings Co., 358 U.S. 38 (1958)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1958-10-13
Topic: bankruptcy

Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. National Malleable & Steel Castings Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

UNITED STATESv. NATIONAL MALLEABLE STEEL CASTINGS CO.,358 U.S. 38(1958)

UNITED STATESv. NATIONAL MALLEABLE STEEL CASTINGS CO. ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT

OF OHIO.

No. 160.

Decided October 13, 1958.

Affirmed.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney GeneralHansen, Charles H. WestonandLewis Bernsteinfor the United States.Luther DayandCurtis C. Williams, Jr. for the National Malleable Steel Castings Co.,James C. Davis,John B. Robinson, Jr. andOrrin B. Garnerfor the American Steel Foundries,Webb I. Vorysfor the Buckeye Steel Castings Co.,Wilmer Mechlinfor the Symington Wayne Corporation,Charles W. Sellersfor the McConway Torley Corporation, andKenneth F. Burgess,D. Robert Thomas, Jr. andAshley M. Van Duzerfor the Association of American Railroads, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.Page 39