Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United States v. Mill Creek & Mine Hill Navigation & Railroad ex rel. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

251 U.S. 539

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1919-12-08
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Affirmed upon the' authority of United States v. Larkin, 208 U. S. 333. (Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Mill Creek & Mine Hill Navigation & Railroad ex rel. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the' authority of United States v. Larkin, 208 U. S. 333. (Mr. Justice Pitney took no part in the decision of these cases.) Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson for the United States. Mr. William Clarke Mason, with whom Mr. Charles Heebner was on the briefs, for defendants in error.