Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.

436 U.S. 903

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-05-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • denying defendant’s motion to suppress tape recorded conversations on the basis that progress reports which were to be filed every fifteen days were filed up to two weeks late or not at all
  • “choateness” doctrine does not apply to defeat perfected security interest covering future advances competing with security interest asserted by Small Business Administration

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
28 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.