Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United States Ex Rel. Cateches v. Day

283 U.S. 51

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1931-03-23
Topic
general

Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the Court. This case also arose in the Second Circuit, upon facts similar to those in No. 92, ante, p. 48. The petitioner arrived in this country in October, 1925, upon an Italian ship, deserted at once and since has been engaged in land employment. He was arrested May 8, 1929, and after hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as the petitioner in No. 92.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States Ex Rel. Cateches v. Day. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
60 opinions
UNITED STATESv. DAY,283 U.S. 51(1931)
51 S.Ct. 359
UNITED STATES EX REL. CATECHESv. DAY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 336.
Argued March 2, 1931.
Decided March 23, 1931.
Decided upon the authority ofPhilippidesv.Day, ante, p. 48.45 F.2d 142, affirmed.
CERTIORARI,282 U.S. 817, to review a judgment affirming an
order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus.
Mr. Harold Van Riperfor petitioner.Mr. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whomSolicitor General Thacher, Assistant AttorneyGeneral Dodds, andMessrs. Harry S. Ridgely, andPaul D.Millerwere on the brief, for respondent.
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case also arose in the Second Circuit, upon facts similar to those in No. 92,ante, p. 48. The petitioner arrived in this country in October, 1925, upon an Italian ship, deserted at once and since has been engaged in land employment. He was arrested May 8, 1929, and after hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as the petitioner in No. 92. A writ of habeas corpus was applied for alleging that the arrest was not made within three years from the date of entry. The writ was dismissed by the District Court and the order was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court.Judgment affirmed.Page 52