Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Union Building Corp. v. Conway

Union Bldg. Corp. v. Conway, 57 S. Ct. 233 (1936)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1936-12-07
Topic
general

court may appoint a party's attorney to prosecute a contempt if respondent is properly notified that it is a criminal action | court may appoint a party’s attorney to prosecute a contempt if respondent is properly notified that it is a criminal action

Citator

Cited by
26 opinions
Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114, 121-124; Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell, 233 U. S. 304, 315; Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U. S. 527, 537-542; First National Bank v. Tax Commission, 289 U. S. 60, 63-64; Puget Sound Co. v. Seattle, 291 U. S. *516 619, 626.

Anna Judge Veters for appellant. Messrs. Charles J. Rivet and P. H. Stern for appellee.