UCO Oil Co. v. United States

holding: “We see no basis for substituting our judgment for that of the district judge in interpreting his own order.” | holding: "We see no basis for substituting our judgment for that of the district judge in interpreting his own order." | characterizing coverage of section 1001 as follows: "The law of fraud knows no difference between express misrepresentation on the one hand and implied misrepresentation or concealment on the other." | characterizing coverage of section 1001 as follows: “The law of fraud knows no difference between express misrepresentation on the one hand and implied misrepresentation or concealment on the other.” | extraterritorial application of statute is justified by nationality and objective territorial principles and is constitutional | discussion of use of photographic or electronic presentation of testimony compared to stenographic transcript and live testimony | videotaped depositions of two unindicted co-conspirators unavailable to testify because they were incarcerated in Japan were admissible | 18 U.S.C. § 1001 "... is directed at a single evil, i.e. the `perversion' of `the authorized functions of governmental departments and agencies ... which might result from the deceptive practices described.'" | 18 U.S.C. § 1001 “... is directed at a single evil, i.e. the ‘perversion’ of ‘the authorized functions of governmental departments and agencies ... which might result from the deceptive practices described.’ ”