Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho, 235 U.S. 690 (1914)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1914-11-09
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Idaho. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541.