Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Twentieth Century Travel Advisors, Inc. v. Pitchess

469 U.S. 856

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-10-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • explaining that the experimental use exception is truly narrow and that it bans all activities that are grounded on a profit or commercial motive
  • “trial court ... has considerable discretion in determining whether ... to issue an injunction”
  • under the statutes then in effect, the use of a patented invention without permission was an infringing use even if the use were limited to tests necessary to obtain FDA approval
  • “[The alleged infringer] may intend to perform ‘experiments,’ but unlicensed experiments conducted with a view to the adaption of the patented invention to the experimenter’s business is a violation of the rights of the patentee to exclude others from using his patented invention.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Twentieth Century Travel Advisors, Inc. v. Pitchess. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
49 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.