Trinsey v. State Ethics Commission

"we have recognized that expert testimony of law enforcement officials concerning the particular methods and practices of those engaged in organized criminal activity carries the risk of prejudicing criminal defendants" | " 'the standards applicable in delay-of-sealing cases ... are relevant to the unsealing problem’ ” | “we have recognized that expert testimony of law enforcement officials concerning the particular methods and practices of those engaged in organized criminal activity carries the risk of prejudicing criminal defendants” | trial court may rely on juror’s statement of continued impartiality