Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Transpac Drilling Venture v. United States
513 U.S. 819
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-10-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- granting summary judgment even after plaintiff had established a prima facie case of race discrimination on the grounds that plaintiff had “not offered sufficient evidence to support a finding that [defendant’s] stated reason was a pretext for discrimination.”
- “[T]he allocation of burdens under Title VII applies to proving in tentional discrimination under section 1981 as well.”
- failure to post job vacancies does not, standing alone, amount to evidence of intentional discrimination
- “Durham has not offered sufficient evidence to support a finding that Xerox’s stated reason was a pretext for discrimination.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Transpac Drilling Venture v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 42 opinions
Case below, 26 Cl.Ct. 1245; 16 F.3d 383. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.