Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Transamerica Insurance v. United States

Transamerica Ins. v. United States, 503 U.S. 970 (1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-04-06
Topic
commercial

agency decision, made by head of agency and supported by factual findings, provided "substantial assurance" that the deprivation was "not baseless or unwarranted" | agency decision, made by head of agency and supported by factual findings, provided “substantial assurance” that the deprivation was “not baseless or unwarranted” | "where a disparity in sentences suggests that a defendant who pleaded not guilty was being penalized for exercising his constitutional right to a trial, the reasons for the disparity must appear in the record" | “where a disparity in sentences suggests that a defendant who pleaded not guilty was being penalized for exercising his constitutional right to a trial, the reasons for the disparity must appear in the record” | “[W]here a disparity in sentences suggests that a defendant who pleaded not guilty was being penalized for exercising his constitutional right to a trial, the reasons for the disparity must appear in the record.” | "[W]here a disparity in sentences suggests that a defendant who pleaded not guilty was being penalized for exercising his constitutional right to a trial, the reasons for the disparity must appear in the record."

Citator

Cited by
36 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.