Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Tichnell v. Maryland
104 S. Ct. 2374
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-05-14
- Topic
- general
quoting, Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original) | aggravating circumstance where victim is law enforcement officer killed in performance of duties | in assessing counsel’s performance, court may consider the fact that counsel felt that particular jury would respond more favorably to emotional appeal rather than complicated medical proof | legislature intended to subscribe to purpose of proportionality review as articulated in Gregg and Proffitt | violation of Provence rule not fatal where no mitigating circumstances | violation of Provence rule not fatal where no mitigating circumstances | Art. 23 does not apply to a capital sentencing proceeding | videotape, audio tape, independent expert witness | videotape, audio tape, independent expert witness
Citator
- Cited by
- 79 opinions
Ct. App. Md.;
C. A. 5th Cir.;
Sup. Ct. Ala.;
Sup. Ct. La.;
Sup. Ct. Mo.; and
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-6346, 297 Md. 432, 468 A. 2d 1 (first case), 297 Md. 563, 468 A. 2d 45 (second case); No. 83-6430, 721 F. 2d 990; No. 83-6459, 444 So. 2d 400; No. 83-6527, 443 So. 2d 546; No. 83-6568, 661 S. W. 2d 487; No. 83-6583, 707 F. 2d 1339.