Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Tibble v. Edison Int'l
Tibble v. Edison Int'l, 135 S. Ct. 43 (2014)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2014-10-02
- Topic
- general
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tibble v. Edison Int'l. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1)when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed."