Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

The State of Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Company

State of Tex. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co., 302 U.S. 747 (1937)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1937-11-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • surety and lessee both in § 77(b) proceedings; lessee had rejected lease
  • in addition to being reimbursed after it pays, a surety may “maintain a quia timet suit in equity before any payment,” (quoting Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence § 1417 (3d Ed.)); American Surety Co. v. Lewis State Bank, 58 F.2d 559, 560 (5th Cir.1932

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed The State of Texas v. Anderson, Clayton & Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
40 opinions

302 U.S. 747

58 S.Ct. 265

82 L.Ed. 578

The STATE OF TEXAS, petitioner,
v.
ANDERSON, CLAYTON & COMPANY* et al.

No. 496.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 15, 1937

Mr. A. L. Reed, of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.

1

For opinion below, see 92 F.(2d) 104.

2

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 780, 5, S.Ct. 366, 82 L.Ed. ——.