Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.

50 L. Ed. 2d 753

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-01-10
Topic
general

holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown | holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown | noting that “[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes” | upholding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state magazine publisher without mention of the first amendment | affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which had deducted unemployment insurance | affirming judgment for section 1983 plaintiff based upon beatings by police officer. | affirming judgment for section 1983 plaintiff based upon beatings by police officer. | "... a non-tenured teacher has no 'expectancy' of continued employment, whatever may be the policies of the institution, where there exists a statutory tenure system." | “... a non-tenured teacher has no ‘expectancy’ of continued employment, whatever may be the policies of the institution, where there exists a statutory tenure system.” | damages suffered when barge negligently severed power line to factory measured by value of lost production less saved expenses | nontenured teacher has no expectancy of continued employment where there exists a statutory tenure system | prior to bringing Title VII claim in district court plaintiff must file charges with EEOC | suit alleging retaliatory termination was not time-barred because it alleged the same “core grievance” as an earlier EEOC complaint of retaliation | "The parameters of the civil action in the district court are defined by the scope of the EEOC investigation which can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination.” | employer not automatically vicariously liable for discriminatory acts of supervisors (dicta) | calculated and ordered program of distribution in forum state gave rise to plaintiff’s claim | discussing standard in Title VII action | sex discrimination in job classification | sex discrimination in job classification

Citator

Cited by
137 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.