Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Tefft v. Grant
279 U.S. 824
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1929-05-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- per L. Hand, J.; “verdict must not itself deny the existence of the essential facts” of conspiracy
- "reason for the rule is ... the indivisibility of the crime"
- divided panel questions validity of doctrine
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tefft v. Grant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 73 opinions
Per Curiam:
The appeal is disissed for want-of a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.