Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Taylor v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.

60 L. Ed. 2d 396

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-04-23
Topic
general

holding that an express warranty for a period of one year explicitly extended to future performance | ordering production of taxpayer’s “internal audit reports,” which had identified accounting procedures that misstated revenues and expenses | unauthorized phone access to coomputer supports wire fraud conviction where computer source code considered property under statute | sale of storage facilities to a food processing plant; cause of action accrued on the date when installation was completed | “extension of the normal warranty period does not occur in the usual case, even though all warranties in a sense apply to future performance of goods” | “extension of the normal warranty period does not occur in the usual case, even though all warranties in a sense apply to future performance of goods.” | courts have been harsh in determining whether warranty is one of future performance | "The correct response of a trial judge, when confronted with allegations of improper jury contact, is to give notice to the parties and to question the jurors on the record about any alleged incident.” | cause of action under § 2-725 accrues upon initial installation of product | privilege not applied to documents sought by Internal Revenue Service | upholding the relevance of internal-audit work papers | upholding the relevance of internal-audit work papers | notice is element of claim, not affirmative defense

Citator

Cited by
101 opinions

Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.