Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

533 U.S. 948

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2001-06-29
Topic: employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

How later courts describe this case

granting certiorari petition on the following question: "Whether the Court of Appeals properly determined that a temporary moratorium on land development does not constitute a taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution?"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 19 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: *949 “Whether the Court of Appeals properly determined that a temporary moratorium on land development does not constitute a taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution?”