Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | holding that where tribal court resolves a question of federal law, the federal court should review the decision de novo | holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | holding that oral instructions which require a jury to find mitigating circumstances unanimously to be reversible error | pro se litigant should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that he or she has a valid claim | pro se litigant should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate that he or she has a valid claim | “a single instruction to a jury may not be judged in artificial isolation but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge” | “dismissal with prejudice is a harsh remedy to be used only in extreme situations ...” | question of tribal court jurisdiction is a federal question | question of tribal court jurisdiction is a federal question | question of tribal court jurisdiction is a federal question | question of tribal court jurisdiction is a federal question