Sullivan v. Raza

concluding that, under the terms of the'policy, the United States was clearly an intended third-party beneficiary | dental malpractice; doctrine of res ipsa loquitur of inferred negligence can be applied to expert’s testimony that particular result would not “ordinarily” happen | dental malpractice; doctrine of res ipsa loquitur of inferred negligence can be applied to expert's testimony that particular result would not "ordinarily" happen | “secondary meaning encompasses the situation where people in the public come to think of a word or name as standing for the business of a particular owner” | "[t]he commercial substance of the transaction rather than its form, must be considered, and the courts should guard against sham transactions ..."