Stull v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• finding that defendant "had an experienced counsel and, so long as he retained him, he could not appear pro se"
• the court ruled that it was immaterial that mailed checks could have been hand delivered or otherwise forwarded
• testimony of print shop owner that he received defendant’s work orders through the mail four years prior to trial constituted “no more than a conclusion” and was insufficient to sustain conviction in light of other evidence presented