Strickland v. United States

How later courts describe this case

• “[C]omments were not phrased in personal terms, but appealed to the jury’s understanding of justice and asked that standard be upheld.”
• United States Marshals Service’s failure to effectuate service of process constitutes good cause under Rule 4
• comments during closing argument that defendant could have subpoenaed his own blood spatter experts
• concurring by reason of stare decisis
• post-autopsy photograph more proba tive than prejudicial
• post-autopsy photograph more probative than prejudicial