Strickland v. United States

“[C]omments were not phrased in personal terms, but appealed to the jury’s understanding of justice and asked that standard be upheld.” | United States Marshals Service’s failure to effectuate service of process constitutes good cause under Rule 4 | comments during closing argument that defendant could have subpoenaed his own blood spatter experts | comments during closing argument that defendant could have subpoenaed his own blood spatter experts | concurring by reason of stare decisis | post-autopsy photograph more proba tive than prejudicial | concurring by reason of stare decisis | concurring by reason of stare decisis | post-autopsy photograph more probative than prejudicial | concurring by reason of stare decisis' | concurring by reason of stare decisis | concurring by reason of stare decisis