Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Stone v. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services

519 U.S. 936

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-10-15
Topic
commercial

How later courts describe this case

  • defines bolstering as “permitting] an identification made by one witness to be corroborated by the testimony of another witness who merely testifies that the identification occurred”
  • prosecutor permitted to cross-examine defense’s expert witness with reports containing conclusions of non-testifying expert where non-testifying expert reported these conclusions to defense expert who relied on them in formulating his opinion

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stone v. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.