Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.
525 U.S. 1093
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1999-01-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that a motion to dismiss based on a forum selection provision should be brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3)
- explaining that Rule 12(b)(3) is the appropriate vehicle for raising a motion to dismiss for improper venue on the basis of a forum selection clause
- court declines plaintiffs invitation to become a “super-actuary,” stating that it “is clearly not equipped to become the watchdog of the insurance business”
- motion to dismiss based on forum selection clause in international agreement should be brought under Rule 12(b)(3)
- "Each party hereto irrevocably agrees that the courts of England shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute.”
- ‘‘[i]n order to bind a [nonparty] to a forum selection clause, the party must be ‘closely related’ to the dispute such that it becomes ‘foreseeable’ that it will be bound’’
- former employees can be “qualified individuals”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 48 opinions
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.