Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
St. Tammany Parish Police Jury v. Insbrok
506 U.S. 975
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-11-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- sidewalk dedication requirement serves the same legitimate governmental purposes that would justify denying permits to develop commercially zoned properties
- because the defendants did not suggest any different analysis under the Oregon Constitution than under the United States Constitution, court would assume for purposes of the case, without deciding, that the analysis would be the same under the state constitution
- where guardian ad litem had been appointed to appear on behalf of brain-damaged young child, it was not an abuse of discretion for trial court, notwithstanding the child’s status as a party, to exclude the child from courtroom during liability phase of medical malpractice trial
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed St. Tammany Parish Police Jury v. Insbrok. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 38 opinions
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.