Spinner v. County of Los Angeles

holding that an appointment book and application form containing the defendant’s name were not inadmissible hearsay because they were admitted to explain how the defendant became a part of the police investigation | holding that an appointment book and application form containing the defendant's name were not inadmissible hearsay because they were admitted to explain how the defendant became a part of the police investigation | holding that an appointment book and application form containing the defendant’s name were not inadmissible hearsay because they were admitted to explain how the defendant became a part of the police investigation | holding appointment book and patient application form were not hearsay when tendered to show how appellant became a suspect in the investigation | Prosecutor stated that defense counsel "wants to mislead you a little bit by saying...." | Prosecutor stated that defense counsel “wants to mislead you a little bit by saying_” | jury charge not defective which omitted culpable mental state in application paragraph where definition given in abstract portion of charge | jury charge not defective which omitted culpable mental state in application paragraph where definition given in abstract portion of charge | omission of culpable mental state from the application paragraph was sufficiently supplied by a definition of the offense given in the abstract portion of charge | "the charge must contain an accurate statement of the law and must set out all the essential elements of the offense." | “the charge must contain an accurate statement of the law and must set out all the essential elements of the offense.” | Prosecutor stated that defense counsel "wants to mislead you a little bit by saying...."