Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
South Bend v. DeHaven
302 U.S. 644
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1937-10-25
- Topic
- general
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana. Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed South Bend v. DeHaven. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana.
Per Curiam:The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640. (2) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; City of Holton v. Kansas State Bank, 300 U. S. 641.