Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'n

"We hold . . . that it is within the trial judge's discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case" | "We hold ... that it is within the trial judge's discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case” | “We hold ... ’that it is within the trial judge’s discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case”.... (citation omitted) | psychiatrist who never examined defendant may base opinion on reports prepared by persons who did | `We hold ... that it is within the trial judge's discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case' .... (citation omitted) | psychiatrist who did not personally examine the defendant was permitted to render an opinion based on reports prepared by others who examined the defendant but did not testify at trial | "our decisions teach that whether counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient depends upon the totality of the circumstances viewed through a lens shaped by the rules and presumptions set down in Strickland v. Washington , and its progeny" | “[A] petitioner seeking to rebut the strong presumption of effectiveness bears a difficult burden.”