Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'n
Solimine v. Int’l L. Students Ass'n, 516 U.S. 856 (1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-10-02
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- "We hold . . . that it is within the trial judge's discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case"
- “We hold ... ’that it is within the trial judge’s discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case”.... (citation omitted)
- psychiatrist who never examined defendant may base opinion on reports prepared by persons who did
- psychiatrist who did not personally examine the defendant was permitted to render an opinion based on reports prepared by others who examined the defendant but did not testify at trial
- "our decisions teach that whether counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient depends upon the totality of the circumstances viewed through a lens shaped by the rules and presumptions set down in Strickland v. Washington , and its progeny"
- “[A] petitioner seeking to rebut the strong presumption of effectiveness bears a difficult burden.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'n. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 47 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.