Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'n

Solimine v. Int’l L. Students Ass'n, 516 U.S. 856 (1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-10-02
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • "We hold . . . that it is within the trial judge's discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case"
  • “We hold ... ’that it is within the trial judge’s discretion to fashion the appropriate remedy under the particular facts of each case”.... (citation omitted)
  • psychiatrist who never examined defendant may base opinion on reports prepared by persons who did
  • psychiatrist who did not personally examine the defendant was permitted to render an opinion based on reports prepared by others who examined the defendant but did not testify at trial
  • "our decisions teach that whether counsel's performance is constitutionally deficient depends upon the totality of the circumstances viewed through a lens shaped by the rules and presumptions set down in Strickland v. Washington , and its progeny"
  • “[A] petitioner seeking to rebut the strong presumption of effectiveness bears a difficult burden.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Solimine v. International Law Students Ass'n. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
47 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.