Snider v. Temple University

invalidating, inter alia, 14% rate reduction based on a "budget neutrality adjustment", for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13)(A) | invalidating, inter alia, 14% rate reduction based on a “budget neutrality adjustment”, for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13)(A) | This court rejected as “disingenuous” defendant’s efforts to support summary judgment on all claims where it only sought summary judgment as to some claims. | fact that bond requirement effectively deprived indigent plaintiffs of preliminary injunction did not work a sufficient hardship, because the underlying issue could still be resolved by the underlying litigation | “Rule 56(c) allows a court to grant a summary judgment in favor of a party that did not request it” | “As to the inadequacy of legal remedies, the Eleventh Amendment bar to an award of retroactive damages against the [state] clearly establishes that any legal remedy is unavailable and the only relief available is equitable in nature.” | two years elapsed between filing of complaint and proposed amendment | setting forth the elements of collateral estoppel