Shyres v. United States

statements that plaintiff was no longer employed in connection with licensing problems at the VA hospital insufficient | no property interest came into being because, under applicable federal statute, Veteran Administration’s appointment of an unlicensed physician was void ab initio | “response to a jury request for supplemental instructions is a matter within the sound discretion of the [trial court]” | disclosure to Office of Thrift Supervision did not waive privilege as to internal investigation of banking violations | physician who did not meet the statutory requirements for employment with the Veterans Administration at the time of appointment had no property right in employment | statements that plaintiff was no longer employed in connection with licensing problems at the VA hospital insufficient | "This court is not obligated to research and construct legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel as in this case." | physician who did not meet the statutory requirements for employment with the Veterans Administration at the time of appointment had no property right in employment | in prosecution for false tax returns, venue lies in any district in which a false tax return was made and subscribed or filed | corpo-ration’s disclosure of internal investigation report to grand jury did not waive attorney-client privilege | test is whether the acts are those normally performed by a judge | test is whether the acts are those normally performed by a judge | privilege not waived by production of documents to grand jury | Rule 26.2 reads virtually verbatim to Rule 614 | Rule 26.2 reads virtually verbatim to Rule 614 | Rule 26.2 reads virtually verbatim to Rule 614 | accused has no right to a specific government expert