Shippy v. Estelle

upholding an ICC regulation "requiring the remittance to freight car owners of all demurrage charges collected by the delivering carrier that are in excess of ten dollars per day per car" | upholding an ICC regulation “requiring the remittance to freight car owners of all demurrage charges collected by the delivering carrier that are in excess of ten dollars per day per car” | "better view" is that trial judge decide existence of "common law" marriage for purposes of claim of spousal privilege | because the Interstate Commerce Act “contains no express sanction for noncompliance” with the statutory deadline, belated agency proceedings need not be dismissed | arbitrary and capricious decisions must be “rationally supported”