Shell Oil Co. v. Piamco, Inc.

holding that the amount of restitution under the VWPA or the FPA may not exceed the actual losses flowing from the offense for which the defendant has been convicted. | rejecting "the view that the mainstreaming provisions of the Act are satisfied only if a handicapped child is educated in the same classroom with non-handicapped children" | rejecting “the view that the mainstreaming provisions of the Act are satisfied only if a handicapped child is educated in the same classroom with non-handicapped children” | this Court refused to address an exclusionary rule issue which the Commonwealth failed to adequately preserve | this Court refused to address an exclusionary rule issue which the Commonwealth failed to adequately preserve | evidence supported jury verdict that the Form 355’s submitted to SBA constituted mail fraud because the forms were not reflective of defendant’s true size