Shandon Inc. v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.

How later courts describe this case

• holding aggravating circumstances of “prior violent felony” and “continuing threat” were not duplicative and therefore the weighing process was not skewed
• suggesting that using the singular form of a word, like “cabinet,” to describe an apparatus precludes the assertion that multiple units, like “cabinets,” literally infringe the claim
• “The presumption of regularity attaches to this situation, requiring this court to presume, in the absence of a contrary showing, that the trial court acted in accordance with its ruling[.]”
• to interpret disputed terms, court considers specification and prosecution history