Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How later courts describe this case

• unnecessary to invoke court’s supervisory powers to dismiss indictment when “grand jurors were aware of the nature of the evidence before them and, indeed, were told explicitly that they could ‘seek something better if they wish.’ Estepa at 1137.”
• use of summaries analyzed under Estepa test and found valid
• breach of contract claim with counterclaim implicating the EPAA