Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.

110 S. Ct. 1924

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-04-23
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that there can be no extracontraetual recovery in the context of an ERISA plan
  • “[W]hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
109 opinions

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.