Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Schwartz v. Doc's Food Stores, Inc.

Schwartz v. Doc's Food Stores, Inc., 519 U.S. 816 (1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-10-07
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that a party's failure to controvert Rule 3(g) statement is treated as an admission of those facts
  • unswom statement in claimant’s letter properly disregarded as opposition to summary judgment
  • party’s failure to controvert Rule 3(g) Statement treated as admission of those facts

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schwartz v. Doc's Food Stores, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
19 opinions

Ct. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.