Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Schwartz v. Doc's Food Stores, Inc.
519 U.S. 816
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-10-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that a party's failure to controvert Rule 3(g) statement is treated as an admission of those facts
- unswom statement in claimant’s letter properly disregarded as opposition to summary judgment
- party’s failure to controvert Rule 3(g) Statement treated as admission of those facts
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schwartz v. Doc's Food Stores, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 19 opinions
Ct. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.