Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Schapansky v. Department of Transportation

469 U.S. 1018

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-11-13
Topic
bankruptcy

holding district court order which extended a deadline provided in a consent decree to be "in the nature of a preliminary injunction" and appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(a)(1) | holding district court order which extended a deadline provided in a consent decree to be "in the nature of a preliminary injunction" and appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) | less than thirty day statutory notice period not harmful error when there was reasonable cause to believe a crime had been committed | less than thirty day statutory notice period not harmful error when there was reasonable cause to believe a crime had been committed | six day rather than statutory seven day reply period not harmful error | six day rather than statutory seven day reply period not harmful error | “A court possesses inherent power to modify its consent decree.”

Citator

Cited by
46 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 84-258, 735 F. 2d 477 (first case), 735 F. 2d 488 (second case), 735 F. 2d 504 (third case), 735 F. 2d 524 (fourth case), 735 F. 2d 516 (fifth case), 735 F. 2d 526 (sixth case); No. 84-259, 735 F. 2d 537.