Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Scanlon v. Battle
69 L. Ed. 2d 981
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-06-22
- Topic
- general
"the extinguishment of all Indian title was meant to be a matter of federal concern" | “the extinguishment of all Indian title was meant to be a matter of federal concern” | ”[w]here basic self-help and social skills such as toilet training ... and communication are lacking, formal education begins at that point” | “[djefenses based upon state adverse possession laws and state statutes of limitation have been consistently rejected” | title of Act cannot contradict more specific language contained in body of Act | "any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the United States. (20 U.S.C.) § 1415(e)(2)" | “any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the United States. [20 U.S.C.] § 1415(e)(2)” | inflexible 180-day rule precludes the proper formulation of appropriate education | oil and gas are minerals
Citator
- Cited by
- 45 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of National School Boards Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Justice White would grant certiorari.